Israel Updates its Computer Law to Comply with the Budapest Convention

Last week Israel amended its Computer Law to bring it in line with the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime. The Knesset created a new Section 6 to replace the old one. The new Section 6 makes it a crime to write or distribute software to infiltrate another's computer or or cause that computer to print false information, or whose purpose is to infringe on another's privacy or conduct eavesdropping even without actually causing harm or interference with the compromised system. It also tracks the Budapest Convention in requiring intent for the crimes listed in Section 6.


I couldn't find an English translation of the Computer Law online, so I am providing a translation that I (and Google) made after the jump.


For articles on Israel's Computers Law see this by Ruth Levush who apparently is the Law Library of Congress' Israel law expert, and an article called Computer Legislation: Israel's New Codified Approach from 1996 written by one of the law's drafters, Miguel Deutch, but not freely available online, and here and here for articles relevant to this topic. Bear in mind, however, that all of these sources in addressing Section 6, are addressing the old Section 6.

Israel Enacts Patent Amendments

One of the major aspects of the new patent amendment is the change to publication of patent applications after 18 months instead of the 30 months that was previously the case.

For more on the new amendments, see the America-Israel Patent Law Blog.

Proposed Amendments to the Protection of Privacy Law (1981)

Amendments to the Protection of Privacy Law (1981) have been proposed in the Knesset.

The new amendments will provide that:

• acts done by parents or guardians that would otherwise be a breach of the privacy of a child will not be considered a breach if done for the benefit of the child;
• "child" shall be defined as one up to and including 13 years of age;
• someone who purposely breaches the privacy of a minor can be punished by up to 7 years in jail;
• a person requesting information  from a child for inclusion in a database must first receive the consent of the child's parent or guardian;
• direct mail may not be sent to a child without prior permission from a parent or guardian;
• requesting information from a child or sending him direct mail without prior consent from a parent or guardian is punishable by up to 3 years in jail.

And an amendment to the Consumer Protection Law (1981) would prevent anyone from exploiting the age of a counterparty to a transaction.

I must say, I think the proposed jail terms seem a bit excessive especially when according to the notes to the proposed amendment convictions under the law do not require a showing of intent or negligence.


It is interesting that "child" is defined as up to and including 13 years old. First, that is the age of adulthood for boys in Jewish law. Second, Facebook does not allow anyone under the age of 13 to create an account but 13-year-olds are permitted. So under this law, Israeli teens will have a one year waiting period until they are Facebook legal.